Extraordinary Leadership for North Dakota Banks
menu
menu
Advocacy
Strategic Partners
Education
NDBanks Benefit Trust
Communications
About
Events
Career Network
Sign In
Extraordinary Leadership for North Dakota Banks
About
Events
Career Network
Sign In
Advocacy
Ask Kennedy
Bank Exam Prep Center
Legislative Updates
Legal Publications
Legal Counsel
Legislative Committee
NDBankPAC
Advocacy Resources
Strategic Partners
Endorsed Vendors
Partner Resources
Business Partner Directory
Associate Member Listing
Associate Member Guide
Associate Member Benefits
Associate Member Application
Sponsorship Opportunities
Advertising Opportunities
Education
2023 Tri-State Trust Conference
Conferences
Schools
Peer Groups
Event Registration
IT Certification Programs
Online Training
Web Seminars
Financial Literacy
NDBanks Benefit Trust
NDBBT Board of Directors
Communications
News
COVID-19
NDBA Bulletin
Service Award Application
Advertising Opportunities
Bank Holiday Signs
Advocacy
Strategic Partners
Education
NDBanks Benefit Trust
Communications
Home
»
Communications
»
News
»
California Regulator Faults Self, Technology for SVB Closure
California Regulator Faults Self, Technology for SVB Closure
Posted:
May 10 2023
State and federal banking regulators did not take steps to ensure that Silicon Valley Bank quickly addressed problems identified by supervisors before its collapse, the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation stated. In its report, the state agency identified several causes for SVB’s failure and pledged to take action to reduce the likelihood of similar events in the future. In addition to possible changes to its supervisory approach, DFPI said it would require California banks to better manage technological risks posed by social media and real-time withdrawals.
The report noted that while the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco was the primary regulator of the bank, both the Fed and DFPI had initiated supervisory actions related to SVB’s risk management, liquidity and interest rate risk simulations in the months before its failure. Both agencies failed to press SVB to fix those problems, the report concluded. “SVB had undertaken corresponding remediation efforts, but the regulators did not take adequate measures to ensure SVB did so with enough speed.”
DFPI pledged to take action to address the shortcomings identified in the report, including working with federal regulators to develop stronger systems to remediate deficiencies promptly, and continuing work to develop large bank supervisory plans for all banks with assets of more than $10 billion. However, the report also concluded that digital banking technology and social media accelerated the volume and speed of the run on SVB, which contributed to its ultimate collapse. As a result, the agency will require banks in the state to factor in such risks.
“Going forward, the DFPI will require banks to consider their susceptibility to real-time deposit withdrawals and reputational risk posed by viral social media posts or from short sellers in publicly traded scenarios,” the report said. “Examiners will discuss with bank management what kind of social media monitoring a bank is conducting and how the bank intends to confront reputational and public relations concerns in the digital age.”
To read more, visit:
https://dfpi.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/337/2023/05/Review-of-DFPIs-Oversight-and-Regulation-of-Silicon-Valley-Bank.pdf